• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to footer

Opinion.org

#Opinion: opinion matters

  • Sponsored Post
  • About
  • Contact

Women in the Workplace 2018: Women Are Doing Their Part. Now Companies Need to do Their Part, Too

October 23, 2018 By Opinion.org

Largest study of women in the workplace shows companies need to treat gender diversity like the business priority it is and close gender gaps early in the pipeline. Until they do, meaningful progress will remain out of reach.

Today, McKinsey & Company and LeanIn.Org released Women in the Workplace 2018, the largest annual report on the state of women in corporate America. The report shows there is a disconnect in corporate America. Companies continue to report that they are highly committed to gender diversity but the proportion of women in their organizations barely budges. For this to change, companies need to treat gender diversity like the business imperative it is and close critical gender disparities at the first step-up to manager. The report also recommends additional actions that companies need to take to make progress.

“The business case for diversity is clear. Research shows it leads to better performance, more innovation, and stronger economic growth, said Sheryl Sandberg, COO of Facebook and founder of LeanIn.Org. “If women participated in the U.S. workforce at the same rate as men, we could grow the GDP by 5 percent. Still, year after year, the gender gap in corporate America remains. Improving the representation of women is the right thing to do and the smart thing to do. Women are leaning in. Companies need to lean in, too.”

Drawing on pipeline data from 279 companies employing more than 13 million people, the 2018 report shows that progress isn’t just slow – it’s stalled. Women continue to be vastly underrepresented at every level in corporate America, and for women of color, it’s even worse. Only about one in five senior leaders is a woman, and one in twenty five is a woman of color.

This disparity continues despite women doing their part. They’ve been earning more bachelor’s degrees than men for decades. They’re asking for promotions and negotiating salaries at the same rates as men. And contrary to conventional wisdom, they are staying in the workforce at the same rate as men.

Now companies must do their part, too. That starts with treating gender diversity like the business priority it is, from setting targets to holding leaders accountable for results – especially managers and leaders, who are often the ones driving change.

In addition, companies should focus on the two biggest levers that move the pipeline: hiring and promotions. Although women earn more bachelor’s degrees than men, they are less likely to be hired into entry-level jobs. At the first critical step up to manager, the disparity widens further. Women are less likely to be hired into manager-level jobs, and they are far less likely to be promoted into them—for every one hundred men promoted to manager, seventy-nine women are. Largely because of these gender gaps, men end up holding 62% of manager positions, while women hold only 38%.

This early inequality has a profound impact on the talent pipeline: if companies continue to hire and promote women to manager at current rates, the number of women in management will increase by a mere 1 percentage point over the next ten years. But if companies start hiring and promoting women and men to manager at equal rates, we can nearly close the gender gap in management over the same ten years.

It’s critically important that companies take bold steps to balance the scales. This begins with establishing clear, consistent criteria for hiring and reviews, because when they are based on subjective impressions or preferences, bias comes into play. Companies should train employees so they understand how unconscious bias can impact who’s hired and promoted—and who’s not. And they should track outcomes to make sure candidates are being treated fairly.

One important consequence of the corporate gender gap is that being “the only one” is still a common experience for women. One in five women says they are often the only woman or one of the only women in the room at work—in other words, they are “Onlys.” Women who are Onlys are having a significantly worse experience than women who work with more women. They face more everyday discrimination – or microaggressions – like being subjected to demeaning comments or being mistaken for someone much more junior. They are also twice as likely to have been sexually harassed at some point in their career. And they are significantly more likely to think about leaving their job. Companies can make this “Only” experience less common by hiring and promoting women in greater numbers and finding ways to cluster women together on teams.

The report also confirms that sexual harassment continues to pervade the workplace. Thirty-five percent of women in corporate America experience sexual harassment at some point in their careers. And while 98% of companies have policies that make it clear sexual harassment is not tolerated, many employees think their company is falling short in putting policies into practice. Just 62% of employees say that in the past year their company has reaffirmed that sexual harassment won’t be tolerated, and a similar number say that they’ve received training or guidance on the topic. Moreover, only 60% of employees think a sexual harassment claim would be fairly investigated and addressed by their company—and just 32% believe it would be addressed quickly.

Fostering an environment where all employees feel included and respected starts with making sure everyone feels safe. That means communicating that sexual harassment is not acceptable and reviewing and handling reports of harassment promptly and decisively. Companies should also develop clear guidelines for what collegial and respectful behavior looks like—as well as unacceptable and uncivil behavior – and publicize them broadly.

“This research shows that there are concrete ways to take us from problems to investing in and implementing solutions to accelerate change,” said Kevin Sneader, global managing partner of McKinsey & Company.” We have an opportunity to make considerable strides in changing the status quo.”

Based on four years of data and insights from a range of experts, the report recommends six concrete actions that companies can take to make progress on gender diversity. It also highlights case studies on specific practices and outcomes from Allstate, Airbnb, Hilton, L’Oreal, Mozilla, P&G, Sodexo and VMware.

The complete Women in the Workplace 2018 report, including detailed findings and recommendations for change, is available at womenintheworkplace.com. From the website, organizations can download the report and sign up to participate in this ongoing research.

KEY FINDINGS

Women remain significantly underrepresented, and particularly women of color. Corporate America has made almost no progress improving women’s representation. Women are underrepresented at every level, and women of color are the most underrepresented group of all. Only about one in five senior leaders is a woman, and one in twenty five is a woman of color.

Women are left behind from the get-go—and never catch up. Women are less likely to be hired into entry-level and manager-level jobs, and they are far less likely to be promoted to manager. For every 100 men promoted to manager, just 79 women are promoted. This gap in the promotion rate to manager is worse for women of color. Most notably, for every 100 men promoted to manager, 60 Black women are. Largely because of these gaps, men end up holding 62% of manager positions, while women hold only 38%. If companies continue to hire and promote women to manager at current rates, the number of women in management will increase by just 1% over the the next ten years. But if companies start hiring and promoting women and men to manager at equal rates, we should get close to parity in management – 48% women versus 52% men – over the same ten years.

Women get less of the manager support that advances careers. Women, especially women of color, receive less support from managers than men do — and Black women receive the least support of all. This is a problem because manager support is tied to positive outcomes like higher promotion rates and a stronger desire to stay with a company. Not surprisingly, women are also three times more likely than men to think that their gender has played a role in their missing out on a raise, promotion, or other chance to get ahead. Nearly a third of women of color—and almost half of Black women—think their race has played a role in missed opportunities and will make it harder for them to advance. And over a quarter of lesbian women feel the same way about their sexuality.

Most women face workplace microaggressions, and those encounters add up. Almost two-thirds of women have dealt with everyday discrimination – or microaggressions – like being subjected to demeaning comments or being mistaken for someone much more junior. Black women and lesbian women experience microaggressions at a higher rate than women overall, 69% and 71%, respectively. As their name suggests, microaggressions can seem small when dealt with one by one. But when repeated over time, they can have a major impact: women who experience microaggressions view their workplaces as less fair and are three times more likely to regularly think about leaving their job than women who don’t.

Sexual harassment continues to pervade the workplace. Thirty-five percent of women in corporate America experience sexual harassment at some point in their careers, from hearing sexist jokes to being touched in an inappropriately sexual way. For some women the experience is far more common. Fifty-five percent of women in senior leadership, 48% of lesbian women, and 45% of women in technical fields report they’ve been sexually harassed.

Companies need to underscore that sexual harassment won’t be tolerated and take concrete steps to back it up. Ninety-eight percent of companies have policies that make it clear sexual harassment is not tolerated, but many employees think their companies are falling short putting policies into practice. Just 62% of employees say that in the past year their company has reaffirmed that sexual harassment won’t be tolerated. Moreover, only 60% of employees think a sexual harassment claim would be fairly investigated and addressed by their company—and just 32% believe it would be addressed quickly.

Being “the only woman in the room” is still a common experience. One in five women say they are often the only or one of the only women in the room at work–in other words, they are “Onlys.”

This is twice as common for senior-level women and women in technical roles: around 40% of them are Onlys. Onlys are having a much worse time at work than other women. They are more likely to have their abilities challenged and to be subjected to unprofessional and demeaning remarks, and they are almost twice as likely to have been sexually harassed at some point in their careers.

Engaging men is critical but challenging. There is a strong correlation between the degree to which people experience bias and how personally committed they are to diversity. Lesbian women and women of color are the most personally committed to both gender and racial diversity, followed by gay men, men of color, and white women. White men are the least committed—and are also the least likely to say they experience bias. This commitment gap can be significant. For example, 67% of women of color are personally committed to gender diversity, but just 51% of white men are. There are also signs of a backlash among men: 15% think their gender will make it harder for them to get ahead, even though their representation in the workplace far surpasses women’s.

Company commitment to diversity is high but some employees see it as lip service. The vast majority of companies say that they’re highly committed to gender and racial diversity, yet the evidence indicates that many are not treating diversity as the business imperative it is. In contrast to what companies say about their commitment, only around half of all employees think that their organization sees gender diversity as a priority and is doing what it takes to make progress. Around 20% of employees say that their company’s commitment to gender diversity feels like lip service. And few organizations are making a strong business case for gender diversity: while 76% of companies have articulated a business case, only 13% have taken the critical next step of calculating the positive impact on the business.

RECOMMENDED SOLUTIONS

1) Get the basics right – targets, reporting and accountability. Experts agree that setting goals, tracking and reporting progress, and rewarding success are key to driving organizational change. Yet when it comes to gender diversity, more companies need to put these practices in place. Only 38% of companies set targets for gender representation and only 12% share a majority of gender diversity metrics with their employees. Only 42% hold senior leaders accountable for making progress toward gender parity, and even fewer hold managers and directors accountable.

2) Ensure that hiring and promotions are fair. Hiring and promotions are the two biggest levers for changing the representation of women across the pipeline, yet very few companies have end-to-end processes in place to ensure fair practices. Fewer than one in three companies sets diversity targets for hiring and promotions, even though setting goals is critical to achieving them. Fewer than one in four companies uses tools to reduce bias when reviewing résumés, and fewer than half of companies require diverse slates of candidates for external hiring. Just 19% of companies require unconscious bias training for employees involved in hiring – and a mere 4% require training for employees involved in performance reviews.

3) Make senior leaders and managers champions of diversity. Only 39% of women – and 47% of men – say that gender diversity is a high priority for their manager and just over 1 in 5 employees believes senior leaders are held accountable for results. Less than a third of employees say that managers often challenge biased language and behavior when they see or hear it. Until leaders at all levels understand the problem, are trained to help solve it, and are held accountable for making progress, it will be hard to achieve lasting change.

4) Create an inclusive and respectful culture. Companies should develop clear guidelines for what collegial and respectful behavior looks like—as well as unacceptable and uncivil behavior. To be treated seriously, these guidelines should be supported by a clear reporting process and swift consequences for disrespectful behavior. Women who believe that disrespectful behavior toward women is often quickly addressed at their company are 44% less likely to think about leaving their job.

5) Make the “Only” experience rare. Companies should take steps to reduce the number of women who are the only one in the room—and who feel isolated and under pressure as a result. In addition to increasing the representation of women, companies should be thoughtful about how they move women through their organizations. One approach is to hire and promote women in cohorts and cluster women on teams.

6) Give employees the flexibility to fit work into their lives. To increase the representation of women at all levels, companies need to find more ways to help employees balance work and family. A majority of companies offer employees some flexibility to ease work-life friction, such as the ability to work part-time or telecommute. But fewer companies address the unique challenges faced by parents. As one example, fewer than two-thirds of companies offer maternity leave beyond what’s required by law, and just over half offer fathers the same benefit. In addition, only 45% of employees say that their manager regularly helps them balance work and personal demands – and women and men feel equally unsupported.

ABOUT THE STUDY
Women in the Workplace 2018 is the largest comprehensive study of the state of women in corporate America. Since 2015, LeanIn.Org and McKinsey & Company have published this report annually to give companies and employees the information they need to advance women and improve gender diversity within their organizations. McKinsey & Company also conducted similar research in 2012. This year, 279 companies employing more than 13 million people shared their pipeline data and completed a survey of their HR practices. In addition, more than 64,000 employees were surveyed on their workplace experiences, and we interviewed women of different races and ethnicities and LGBTQ women for additional insights. Since 2015, 462 companies employing almost 20 million people have participated in the study.

About LeanIn.Org

An initiative of the Sheryl Sandberg & Dave Goldberg Family Foundation, LeanIn.Org works to help women achieve their ambitions and create a more equal world. LeanIn.Org offers inspiration and support through an online community, free education materials, and Lean In Circles, small groups of peers who meet regularly to learn and grow together. The Lean In community includes over two million women and men and 40,000 Lean In Circles in 169 countries. The Sheryl Sandberg & Dave Goldberg Family Foundation, which also runs OptionB.Org, is a private operating nonprofit organization under IRS section 501(c)(3).

About McKinsey & Company

McKinsey & Company is a global management consulting firm, deeply committed to helping institutions in the private, public, and social sectors achieve lasting success. For more than nine decades, the firm’s primary objective has been to serve as our clients’ most trusted external advisor. With consultants in more than one hundred offices in sixty countries, across industries and functions, McKinsey & Company brings unparalleled expertise to clients anywhere in the world, working closely with teams at all levels of an organization to shape winning strategies, mobilize for change, build capabilities, and drive successful execution.

MEDIA CONTACT

We are actively monitoring [email protected] for press inquiries.

SOURCE LeanIn.Org

Related Links
http://womenintheworkplace.com

Filed Under: Opinion

Footer

Recent Posts

  • The Worst Nightmare of Tehran Is Israel, Not Trump
  • What Scott Bessent Doesn’t Say: America’s Debt Crisis Is Bigger Than His Inflation Argument
  • Garamendi Condemns Trump’s Decision to Ease Russian Diesel Sanctions, Warning of Risks to U.S. National Security
  • Pedro Sánchez Had It Coming as Spain Heads to a Snap Election
  • Allister Heath Is Right: Britain Is Poorer, More Backward and Less Relevant Than Britons Realise
  • Trump Is Right About the AI Race With China, Even After the Coxon Warning
  • How Authoritarian States Captured UN Machinery Under Guterres, and Why the Secretary-General Is Always Chosen Weak
  • Qatar and Turkey Funded the Infrastructure Behind Europe’s Palestine Protests
  • Who’s Going to Tell Trump That Kim Jong Un’s “Respectful” Country Starves Its Own Citizens
  • Ukraine Picked the Right Target in Wildberries, and the Kremlin’s Reaction Proves It

Media Partners

  • Opinion.org
  • k4i.com
  • OSINT.org
The Worst Nightmare of Tehran Is Israel, Not Trump
What Scott Bessent Doesn’t Say: America’s Debt Crisis Is Bigger Than His Inflation Argument
Garamendi Condemns Trump’s Decision to Ease Russian Diesel Sanctions, Warning of Risks to U.S. National Security
Pedro Sánchez Had It Coming as Spain Heads to a Snap Election
Allister Heath Is Right: Britain Is Poorer, More Backward and Less Relevant Than Britons Realise
Trump Is Right About the AI Race With China, Even After the Coxon Warning
How Authoritarian States Captured UN Machinery Under Guterres, and Why the Secretary-General Is Always Chosen Weak
Qatar and Turkey Funded the Infrastructure Behind Europe’s Palestine Protests
Who’s Going to Tell Trump That Kim Jong Un’s “Respectful” Country Starves Its Own Citizens
Ukraine Picked the Right Target in Wildberries, and the Kremlin’s Reaction Proves It
Venture Funding Digest October 22 2026 Shows Money Chasing Supply Chain Independence
Venture and M&A Digest: Valon Raises $150M at $2.3B, C.H. Robinson to Acquire RXO
Tech News Digest, October 3, 2026: Supabase Buys Turso, Broadcom's $60B AI Chip Financing, Flock Ruling, Plus Five Infrastructure Projects
Borsa Istanbul Fund Scandal: Turkey's Regulator Is Prosecuting the Collapse Its Own Rule Set Off
Fed Hikes Rates for the First Time Since 2023 and the 10-Year Treasury Yield Falls Back Below 5%
Chip Stocks Sell Off on Amodei's Pacing Call While 2026 Capex Forecasts Keep Rising
Saudi Arabia Loses Both Export Routes as the Houthis Reach Bab el-Mandeb
Micron (MU) Slips as Intel-Backed Kepler Computing Takes Aim at Memory With 2,000 Wafers to Its Name
Palantir (PLTR) Gave Back Half of a 9.1% Rally While Snowflake Kept 21%
DFEN Fell 33% in a Month While Its Index Fell Only 11%
Vexcel Opens Plain-Language Search of 15.1 Million km² of Aerial Imagery to AI Agents
On-Device Models Turn Eyewear Into a HUMINT Collection Platform
Houthis Fire on Riyadh and Yanbu While Iran Says Hormuz Stays Closed: OSINT Screening, September 20, 2026
OSINT Digest: Taiwan Coercion Moves From Air to Water, and NATO Absorbs 144 Incursions Without Article 4
Pixxel Raises $100M Series C as Hyperspectral Imagery Moves Closer to the Collection Stack
Why European Governments Are Dropping Palantir, and Which Companies Want the Contracts
Qatari and Turkish Funding of European Islamist Networks: An Open-Source Assessment of the Protest Link
RT’s Mirror Domains Outlasted the EU Ban: How OSINT Researchers Map the Network
Room 3603: British Intelligence Ran Its Largest Wartime Station Out of Rockefeller Center
Intel’s $20 Billion Upsize and Cloudflare’s Zero-Coupon Converts Say the AI Boom Is Strengthening

Media Partners

  • Analysis.org
  • Market Analysis
  • CrossGov.com
Smartphone Shipments Fall 20% on Memory Costs as October 22 Surveys Show AI Adoption Outrunning Measurement
Fear and Greed at 21 as Oil and AI Doubts Hit Stocks
Where Is the KOSPI Heading? South Korea’s Stock Market Faces a Critical Test After Its October Collapse
Semiconductor Selloff Exposes the Financial Fragility Behind the AI Boom
Semiconductor Stocks Slide as AI Financing Worries and Rising Oil Weigh on Investors
Foreign Investors Are Selling South Korea, and SK Hynix Is at the Center of the KOSPI Decline
Memory Stocks Are Pricing a Peak While 2027 HBM Prices Are Set to More Than Double
Five Small Infrastructure Projects and the Markets Behind Them: Edge Databases, Agent Security, Usage Metering, Agent Environments, Reverse Proxies
Akamai’s 17% Jump on Anthropic’s $11.6B Deal Skips the 5% Warrant Anthropic Gets in Return
Adobe Closes $340 Million Topaz Labs Deal With ADBE Trading at 10x Earnings
Stocks Fall as Meta Capex Outruns Its Cash Flow, Chips Sink and Brent Tops $111
Why China’s Alleged Memory Chip Breakthrough Should Be Taken With a Grain of Salt
EnergyX’s Trafigura Deal Moves Lithium Extraction From Technology Promise Toward Commercial Scale
Marvell’s New Memory Expanders Target the Economics of AI Inference
AI Financing Fears Are Overrated: Hyperscaler Debt and Nvidia’s Vendor Deals Sit on Real Revenue
HyperCrux Market Analysis: Agent Memory and Local AI Drive Demand for a One-File Multi-Model Database
Small Infrastructure Primitives Run the $700 Billion AI Buildout, and Open Source Is How They Get Adopted
Screening Startup and Product Ideas After a Brainstorm: Four Questions, Money First
An AI Lab Is Paying Up Front for Atlas Energy’s (AESI) Generators as Agentic AI Multiplies Token Demand
Oracle’s Force Majeure Notice on Project Jupiter Shows Where AI Data Center Risk Is Landing
Treasury COINS Act Rule Would Ban US Investment in Chinese and Russian Superintelligence, Supercomputing and Hypersonics
CBO Says Rates 1.5 Points Higher Would Add $6 Trillion to Deficits by 2036, With the 10-Year Yield Already at 5.2%
CRS Tells Congress to Weigh Icebreaker Funding and Command Coordination as Russia Rebuilds Its Arctic Forces
DOE Uses the Defense Production Act to Fund the Constitution Pipeline and Two Grid Projects, Up to $242 Million in Two Weeks
GAO Finds GPS Modernisation Still Behind After DOD Cancels the OCX Ground System and Army Aviation Waits to 2049 for M-Code
GAO Finds NNSA Cut Its Federal Staff 11.9% as the Nuclear Weapons Workload Hits a Cold War High
GAO Finds None of 24 Agencies Ready for Post-Quantum Encryption, and 16 Say It Is Too Early to Test
GAO Finds the US Cannot Tell Who Owns the Critical Mineral Mines on Federal Land
GAO Sets AI and Fiscal Oversight Priorities Through 2032 With No Confirmed Comptroller General and a House Bill Cutting Its Budget 25%
OFAC Hits Iran Offshore Banks, a Cartel del Noreste Racetrack and Chinese Firms Tied to Google Trade Secret Theft in One Week

Copyright © 2026 Opinion.org

Media Partners: Market Analysis · Market Research · Referently · Photography · Hormuz · Taiwan Strait · Policy Maker · Publishing House

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Do not sell my personal information.
Cookie SettingsAccept
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT