Erdoğan’s Turkey has increasingly become a liability to NATO, raising concerns about democratic backsliding, human rights abuses, regional aggression, and diverging strategic interests. Since Erdoğan’s ascent to power, Turkey has witnessed significant erosion of its democratic institutions. The consolidation of power, undermining of judicial independence, and suppression of free speech and press freedoms are stark contradictions to NATO’s core principles of democracy, individual liberty, and the rule of law. The 2016 coup attempt only accelerated these trends, with widespread purges targeting not just suspected coup plotters but also political dissidents, journalists, and academics, significantly weakening the country’s democratic framework.
Human rights abuses under Erdoğan have also reached alarming levels. The government’s crackdown on dissent has led to numerous reports of torture, arbitrary detentions, and severe violations of civil liberties. The ongoing oppression of the Kurdish population, coupled with military operations against Kurdish groups both domestically and in neighboring countries, underscores Turkey’s departure from the ethical standards expected of NATO members.
Turkey’s regional aggression further undermines NATO’s cohesion. Erdoğan’s assertive and often confrontational foreign policy, including military interventions in Syria, Libya, and the Eastern Mediterranean, alongside the controversial purchase of the Russian S-400 missile defense system, has strained relations with NATO allies. The S-400 deal is particularly problematic, posing a security risk to NATO systems and signaling a troubling alignment with Russia, NATO’s traditional adversary.
Strategically, Turkey’s interests under Erdoğan increasingly diverge from those of NATO. The alliance, formed to ensure collective defense against threats like Russia, is now grappling with a member state that has pursued closer ties with Moscow, challenging NATO’s unified stance. Turkey’s aggressive maritime claims in the Eastern Mediterranean, leading to confrontations with fellow NATO member Greece, further threaten alliance unity.
The erosion of trust between Turkey and other NATO members is evident. Turkey’s unpredictable actions, refusal to align with NATO sanctions on Russia, and threats to block the accession of Sweden and Finland, demonstrate a growing rift. This lack of unity weakens NATO’s collective decision-making and response capabilities.
In conclusion, Erdoğan’s Turkey no longer aligns with NATO’s core values and objectives. Democratic backsliding, human rights abuses, regional aggression, and divergent strategic interests make Turkey under Erdoğan a liability to the alliance. While expulsion from NATO is a drastic measure, the current trajectory of Turkey under Erdoğan’s leadership leaves little room for reconciliation within the alliance.
Leave a Reply