Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s long tenure at the helm of Turkish politics has been marked by the centralization of power, reliance on patronage networks, and balancing acts between East and West. But the same strengths that sustained him could also sow the seeds of collapse. One possible scenario combines political overreach, economic deterioration, and shifting alliances, creating a cascade that overwhelms even Erdoğan’s formidable political machinery.
The first fracture would likely emerge from the economy. Turkey has already been struggling under the weight of chronic inflation, currency depreciation, and a brain drain of its younger generation. If inflation spikes again above 80–100% while the lira collapses beyond credibility, daily life for ordinary Turks could become unbearable. This would erode Erdoğan’s traditional base among conservative, lower-income voters who once credited him with economic stability. Business elites, who tolerated his authoritarian turn in exchange for lucrative contracts, might begin to defect, especially if Western sanctions or capital flight cut them off from global markets.
On the political front, municipal elections could act as catalysts. If opposition coalitions—particularly in Istanbul, Ankara, and Izmir—consolidate power and build momentum, Erdoğan could find his grip slipping in urban centers that represent both economic engines and cultural hubs. A strong, charismatic figure emerging from the opposition, capable of bridging secular and conservative camps, could magnify this weakness. In parallel, fractures within Erdoğan’s own AKP and the broader nationalist-Islamist alliance might widen as younger party members see their futures constrained by loyalty to an aging strongman.
Externally, Turkey’s delicate balancing act between NATO and Russia could collapse under stress. A severe geopolitical crisis—such as escalation in the Eastern Mediterranean, renewed conflict in Syria, or a Russian setback in Ukraine—could expose Erdoğan’s transactional diplomacy as unsustainable. If the West perceives Erdoğan as unreliable while Russia views him as expendable, Ankara could suddenly find itself isolated. That isolation would feed back into the economy through sanctions, loss of foreign investment, and disruption of energy flows.
The breaking point in this scenario could come from the security establishment. Turkey’s military and intelligence services have largely been purged and subordinated, but cracks remain. If urban unrest spreads and regional governors lose control, parts of the military might refuse to suppress protests or even side with demonstrators. Unlike the failed coup of 2016, which Erdoğan survived by mobilizing popular support, a new uprising in the face of dire economic collapse could find broader legitimacy, especially if backed by defecting elites.
In such a chain of events, Erdoğan’s collapse would not look like a single dramatic moment but rather a slow unraveling—first economic paralysis, then electoral defeats, then fracturing alliances, and finally a legitimacy crisis that the state security apparatus can no longer contain. The aftermath could be chaotic, with power struggles among opposition parties, Islamist hardliners, and military factions, but the defining fact would be that Erdoğan’s two-decade dominance would be broken.
Leave a Reply